2 ms·
>you will know it’s a baby AGI The article states "Given the breadth and depth of GPT-4's capabilities, we believe that it could reasonably be viewed as an ear
by hammyhavoc 4y ago
>you will know it’s a baby AGI
The article states "Given the breadth and depth of GPT-4's capabilities, we believe that it could reasonably be viewed as an early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system".
"believe" is doing a lot of heavy-lifting here, and you're jumping the gun entirely and calling it an AGI, when that's not what's being said. It's a reach.
It also says this: "and we discuss the challenges ahead for advancing towards deeper and more comprehensive versions of AGI, including the possible need for pursuing a new paradigm that moves beyond next-word prediction"
So, it even states that LLMs are not what's going to create an AGI.
- ben_w 4y agoAs a linguistic relativist, I believe the meaning of words comes from usage rather than definitions; unfortunately, it is clear to me that there is no common definition of what AGI actually means, as it varies from "good at many things" to "superhuman at everything". So, what's the definition you're using when you say it isn't one?
- hammyhavoc 4y agoIt's with the context of OpenAI's blog post in mind and the usage of their word "AGI" stoking the general public's imagination. https://futurism.com/experts-slam-openais-meaningless-new-promises-about-agi https://futurism.com/experts-slam-openais-meaningless-new-pr... The inference being that the use of the term in the research paper is thus nonsensical, and OpenAI's claims within their blog post are outrageous.