Pure fiction. SF's crime rate hasn't changed appreciably in 20 years (it went up and down twice, but it's back where it was). It is safer than: - Baltimore, M

Pure fiction. SF's crime rate hasn't changed appreciably in 20 years (it went up and down twice, but it's back where it was). It is safer than: - Baltimore, MD - New Orleans, LA - Washington, DC - Chicago, IL - Dallas, TX - Philadelphia, PA - Houston, TX and it goes on because 29 other major cities are more dangerous than SF. So where is the outrage about those cities? Seems more like poverty shaming and anti-liberal bias against SF. https://www.macrotrends.net/cities/us/ca/san-francisco/crime-rate-statistics https://www.macrotrends.net/cities/us/ca/san-francisco/crime... What's changed is people can work remotely and don't need to commute, so there's no primary purpose to reside or travel into a city anymore. And, besides, the main problem with SF is that housing there is too damn expensive because of all of the starry-eyed people who yearn to live there.