4 ms·
> starting in 2036 WAAAAAAY too late. Even if it were "by 2036", that would STILL be too late.
by Inityx 3y ago
> starting in 2036
WAAAAAAY too late. Even if it were "by 2036", that would STILL be too late.
- Eji1700 3y agoUnless you've got a magic plan to snap your fingers and get vital infrastructure built overnight, I'd say they're going to be lucky if they can even hit this. I'm glad to see things forcing the issue, but I suspect this is going to lead to very awkward/stupid/worse workarounds rather than serious adoption. If we're lucky the tech will continue to progress at a pace that makes this feasible, but if they don't support this with massive rail infrastructure (which, spoiler, they won't) then there's going to be serious logistics issues.
- wilg 3y agoI think "starting in 2036" and "by 2036" mean the same thing here.