> unionising has been a bad stratagy (sic) that loses. That has been true pretty much forever. If lowering hours, raising pay, better working conditions are a

> unionising has been a bad stratagy (sic) that loses. That has been true pretty much forever. If lowering hours, raising pay, better working conditions are a losing strategy. > Trying to muscle and threaten the organisation in the world most willing to give you money is wildly silly. Glad these organizations never muscle and threaten. I think you have the direction of money mixed up. The workers create the wealth, and the heirs who own IBM stock parasitically expropriate dividend profits from those workers surplus time. The money flows from the workers creating wealth to the aristocratic expropriating parasites. There are two parties here - the workers creating all the newly created wealth with their labor, and the heirs who parasitically expropriate profits from their surplus labor. We know you're not on the side of those of us doing the work, so it's clear which class you're representing.