3 ms·
It's hard to take any of these breathless articles seriously when they say, "Exploded SpaceX rocket devastated a town..." and the like. It's obvious the people
by superkuh 4y ago
It's hard to take any of these breathless articles seriously when they say, "Exploded SpaceX rocket devastated a town..." and the like. It's obvious the people writing the article either don't know what they're talking about or they're intentionally being disengenuous for clicks. The controlled explosion of the SpaceX rocket did not devastate or hurt anything. It happened far offshore at 30k foot up.
The "damage" is almost exclusively to and from the concrete pad being blown apart by the rocket plume into fast moving chunks and dust. The chunks did not devastate any of the town. The wildlife reserve was similarly not devastated. The worst "damage" to non-SpaceX property was the spread of concrete bits and sand.
- atonse 4y agoYup this really feels like the media capitalizing about writing more articles to get the public irritated about Musk, for clicks. I have plenty of complaints about him but the non stop articles have just become comical at this point.
- sixQuarks 4y agoWhat do you expect, it’s Salon.com. They’ve been anti-Elon for years. This is nothing new