Term limits seem like the type of thing that would not necessarily create positive or negative results, but modulate the system. I think it is a thing that fee

Term limits seem like the type of thing that would not necessarily create positive or negative results, but modulate the system. I think it is a thing that feels right to a lot of people, but if you ask "What will term limits achieve, and what are possible unintended consequences of term limits?" I think most proponents of it would have a very hard time coming up with a satisfying answer. I would prefer age limits before term limits. I think the real question to ask is: "If corruption were against the law, would people still want term limits?" or "Will term limits reduce corruption?" I think the answer is no and I think it is obviously no for the latter (revolving door).