3 ms·
Actually I agree. There are probably lots of low-throughput, high-consequence things like that. For the sampling, you'd have to run the same logic. The idea is
by hot_gril 4y ago
Actually I agree. There are probably lots of low-throughput, high-consequence things like that.
For the sampling, you'd have to run the same logic. The idea is just to do it infrequently as to not totally ruin your overall performance. Idk if this would work.
- klysm 4y agoIt’s definitely an interesting idea, I wonder if it’s easy to implement such a thing.