3 ms·
The charitable take would be that he’s an exceptionally compartmentalised thinker who is stuck in a bunch of local maxima. Less charitably, perhaps his ideals
by barnabee 3y ago
The charitable take would be that he’s an exceptionally compartmentalised thinker who is stuck in a bunch of local maxima.
Less charitably, perhaps his ideals are pretty flexible (assuming they exist at all) and within some bounds he’ll say whatever he thinks people want to hear and do whatever he thinks serves him best.
Perhaps a combination of both.