3 ms·
More than depopulation? I don't particularly like the ideology that underpins it, but I don't see how veganism is going to outclass that one in terms of enviro
by omginternets 3y ago
More than depopulation?
I don't particularly like the ideology that underpins it, but I don't see how veganism is going to outclass that one in terms of environmental impact. I'm getting a familiar whiff of "results were decided ahead of time".
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- slowmovintarget 3y agoBill Burr's final solution? That one's not going to solve anything at this point either.
- xboxnolifes 3y agoThe line of what is an acceptable solution was arbitrarily drawn right above (below?) veganism. If our environmental issues are caused due to humans, then removing all (or many) humans would solve the issue better than veganism. Or a more "realistic" single biggest way: No more fossil fuels. At all. That's technically a single change. I think that would have a larger environmental impact.