3 ms·
Centralized state control has no obligation to the environment either.
by asdfman123 4y ago
Centralized state control has no obligation to the environment either.
- claudiulodro 4y agoI don't think they said it did? There are many more social systems out there than simply US-Style Capitalism and Soviet-style Communism. Something like Anarcho-primitivism is one example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-primitivism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-primitivism
- asdfman123 4y agoI see the word “abolition” in the first sentence of that article.
- claudiulodro 4y agoDid you finish the sentence and get to "abandonment of large-scale organization"? The state isn't the one abolishing things in that system.
- asdfman123 4y agoIf you don’t want to use the phrase “the state,” that’s fine. Whatever powerful entity that determines the laws has no obligation to the environment.
- namdnay 4y agoOut there where? In the real world, or in someone’s imagination? It’s like someone saying “java projects get too messy when there are hundreds of developers on them , this new language I’ve invented will be much better, trust me”
- asdfman123 4y agoIf you just give my group absolute power, everything will improve.
- whitemary 4y agoHuh? What are you talking about and who is it directed at?