> the use-after-move checks aren't bugprone in Rust I can't tell if one if us is confused here or if this is just confusing wording, but the check I referred t

> the use-after-move checks aren't bugprone in Rust I can't tell if one if us is confused here or if this is just confusing wording, but the check I referred to is not bug-prone. The pattern of using something after it's been moved from is bug-prone (even though it'd work fine for things like integers, in either language), and it's checking for that bug-prone pattern, hence the name.