4 ms·
People get attached to things, including urban living. I am not sure what you are trying to accomplish with rewriting it from the perspective of travel. That i
by hosh 4y ago
People get attached to things, including urban living.
I am not sure what you are trying to accomplish with rewriting it from the perspective of travel. That is pretty much how I feel about travel and transport infrastructure too.
Some cultures attach a lot of importance on travel, associating it with freedom, or mobility (both in the literal sense, and as a metaphor for class mobility). Don’t get me wrong, I love to travel, to explore, to hike the wildernesses or enjoy different urban locale and take full advantage of the transport infrastructure. That doesn’t mean it isn’t an illusion.
- kiba 4y agoUrban living is more sustainable than living in suburban sprawl. Spreading humans around and reducing our density isn't going to make it more sustainable.
- dsfyu404ed 4y ago[dead]
- eli_gottlieb 4y ago>I am not sure what you are trying to accomplish with rewriting it from the perspective of travel. That is pretty much how I feel about travel and transport infrastructure too. Then you're just a pastoralist and likely a Malthusian, not talking about ecological sustainability at all.
- kdmccormick 4y agoI trying to point out that urban doesn't imply disconnected from ecology, jusy like rural doesn't imply connected to ecology. Walking around my extremely dense city, I see plenty of people growing their own food in their little yards, probably more than I see back in my semirural hometown. For a while I subscribed to a vegan food delivery service. The food is grown a few towns away and delivered daily by cyclists. There is nothing like that back in my hometown; I'd have to do HelloFresh or something.