I'm not anti-ai. I think there's a ton of value in 100% human made art, and I think AI art is still valid art - but I think it's still useful to differentiate

I'm not anti-ai. I think there's a ton of value in 100% human made art, and I think AI art is still valid art - but I think it's still useful to differentiate the two. It's like how unprocessed photography is judged differently from photoshopped art. Also useful for collecting training data. However everything already was - and is - ML assisted at this point. Any photo from a smartphone, autocorrect from MS word, most photo editing, etc. How are those counted? Does github copilot count? Not to mention non-ML but still automated work with CI's, compilers, templates, etc. Does intellij's autocomplete count? One could argue templates/stencils/stamps predate computers. I think there's also a difference between 100% AI made and AI assisted work that needs to be differentiated.