3 ms·

Tried using right now, and it's way better than Stable Diffusion (be it 1.5, 2.1 or SDXL). But is harder to get a good picture. This fine tuned with a good RLH

• grungegun 3y ago
  What does this mean? Isn't the quality of a model determined by how easy it is to get a good picture?
  • vitorgrs 3y ago
    Not necessarily. IMO a good model needs to follow your prompt well, and that was my problem with Stable Diffusion. I've been trying to get a good portrait picture with "neon lights" on Stable Diffusion and it is almost impossible. Meanwhile with the new Dall-e, that was possible. The picture specially with SDXL is good, but it doesn't really have neon lights... I tried now similar prompt on deepfloyd and managed to get there!
    • grungegun 3y ago
      would be interesting if you could used deepfloyd first for image composition, then apply stable diffusion after for purely stylistic modifications
      • vitorgrs 3y ago
        Definitely possible :) I've been doing this with new Dall-e + img2img with Stable Diffusion. Explaining: I created a model of me, and wanted to create some good realistic portrait pictures. First I tried to create a model of me using some of the custom models already exist and the result was bad. Then I tried SD 1.5/2.1... It was better, but couldn't really get some of the prompts make real... Then I tried new Dall-e, saved, and inserted my face with img2img on SD and it worked much better!