Well, most of the examples of the paper are examples where I agree they're linguistically ambiguous so I'm not sure what I'm talking about is so different. The

Well, most of the examples of the paper are examples where I agree they're linguistically ambiguous so I'm not sure what I'm talking about is so different. The John and Anna example comes from the paper. Maybe I'm being harsh because really only one of the examples in the paper is not an example of ambiguity, but the connection to politics is how they choose to justify why their work is useful so it's fair to call that out given there are only three such examples to begin with. If someone wants to show how to use LLM to make news less biased or auto-delete mud-slinging or hidden meanings or whatever then great. I'd be super interested in that, because I think LLMs give us the tools to radically reimagine news and political reporting, but for better or worse it's not this study.