3 ms·
Why have we seen a similar rise in crendialism in countries without similar rulings or laws? Where's the demand for Griggs-compliant intelligence testing? Such
by yamtaddle 3y ago
Why have we seen a similar rise in crendialism in countries without similar rulings or laws? Where's the demand for Griggs-compliant intelligence testing? Such a thing is permitted! Where is it?
This may be a small—very small—part of the puzzle, but I don't see a compelling case that we can point to it and say, "yep, that's what did it!" I don't even see enough to make it look like that's a valuable direction to further examine. The evidence is scant, and behavior we see doesn't look like it ought to if that were the main cause.
> You could simply screen for candidates based on innate cognitive ability.
You could apply racist or sexist requirements laundered through "testing". The whole reason the case was brought was that that was actually happening.
- polski-g 3y ago> Where's the demand for Griggs-compliant intelligence testing? Such a thing is permitted! Where is it? Right here: https://wonderlic.com/ https://wonderlic.com/ > Why have we seen a similar rise in crendialism in countries without similar rulings or laws? Because if you are an active participant in a market, you want to make it very hard for anyone else to enter it so that your own wages are not subject to market supply forces. So you lobby the government to restrict supply in any way possible (licensing, job requirements, training requirements). Its the same reason people are housing YIMBYs until about 30minutes after they close on their house and become NIMBYs.
- yamtaddle 3y ago> Right here: https://wonderlic.com/ https://wonderlic.com/ Cool. So... this and similar things are in wide use, in preference of degree requirements, since it's largely Griggs-related concerns driving the rise in degree requirements, and employers would prefer to just use tests like this? If not, well, guess that's not a major driver of the phenomenon.