3 ms·
Why? To both statements.
by pc86 4y ago
Why? To both statements.
- jruohonen 4y agoThe first was mildly sensed humor. But the second one in my opinion is important for ensuring the integrity in journalism, i.e. a journalist should disclose his or her use of AI. You can count the sport news, financial summaries, etc. out.
- bediger4000 4y agoI already only read the business section for laughs.
- lusus_naturae 4y agoWhy does it matter if an AI wrote the article, though? Does the nature of what's being reported change because of who or what is doing the reporting. You can still hold the organization accountable for any infactual or inaccurate statements. Having a human to hold accountable seems unnecessary and onerous.
- actionfromafar 4y agoAn organization can not be accountable, unless a human is accountable.
- flangola7 4y agoSomeone ordered the use of AI and someone gave it the prompts. Those someones have names that can be written on a subpoena or warrant.
- pc86 4y agoWe're talking about (real) journalism, so presumably there's going to be a byline. That person is responsible, as is the editor, whether AI is used or not.
- jruohonen 4y agoAccountability is one thing; as actionfromafar notes below, a legal person may not be accountable in all cases. Transparency is another thing. The third thing relates to ethics; here the guidance is still in the making, but many have indeed stated that a journalist shouldn't put his or her name to a story generated by AI. https://pressgazette.co.uk/publishers/digital-journalism/ai-news-journalism-ethics/ https://pressgazette.co.uk/publishers/digital-journalism/ai-...