3 ms·
There's also the very poorly designed Inderhavnsbro bridge. It looks nice enough, but they just made some dumb choices in how they've laid it out. https://www.
by ndsipa_pomu 4y ago
There's also the very poorly designed Inderhavnsbro bridge. It looks nice enough, but they just made some dumb choices in how they've laid it out.
https://www.archdaily.com/868904/copenhagens-latest-piece-of-cycle-infrastructure-is-a-stupid-stupid-bridge https://www.archdaily.com/868904/copenhagens-latest-piece-of...
- prmoustache 4y agoAh yes I remember being surprised at those chicanes that are so prone to issues between cyclists and pedestrians. I took it in not too busy times/days so it was ok in that regards but it must really be annoying during rush hours.
- wouldbecouldbe 4y agoThe old bridges are about same size, and prettier: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magere_Brug https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magere_Brug. However this would be a much larger bridger goes over a much larger river that need to support frequent travel of large boats.
- prmoustache 4y agoI think pretty is subjective. I am not a fan soulless all modern cities. For example I once went to Almere in the Netherlands and I found it quite depressing. But on the other hand I like cities which keep very old building and pieces of architectures alongside much more modern ones and I think you can always discuss details but Copenhagen is generally a good example of that. Having said that I have not known Copenhagen in the 1960-1970's so maybe older people would tell me it was much prettier back then.