3 ms·
I don't think so. Outside of labs, I can't remember needing memory safety exploitation or hearing about a major compromise that used such an exploit. I am not
by _8j50 4y ago
I don't think so. Outside of labs, I can't remember needing memory safety exploitation or hearing about a major compromise that used such an exploit.
I am not saying the security improvements are not real, just not orders of magnitude. For example some post exploitation stuff like BYOVD I am sure would be much harder.
A lot of vulns are just mistakes people made. Perhaps LLMs can help with that in the neat future but right now you hardly even need a CVE to compromise even well protected networks. A little phish here, a little abuse of legit software there, patiently look for services and credentials that aren't well protected and voila. Few actors use 0days and auto-updates have made 1-days hard to rely on
- selfmodruntime 4y ago> I don't think so. Outside of labs, I can't remember needing memory safety exploitation or hearing about a major compromise that used such an exploit. NSO group. Stuxnet.
- _8j50 4y agoI said "I" as in myself who is neither of those things. I also said the following because of in part the point you are trying to make: > I am not saying the security improvements are not real