3 ms·
The actual grim part: It's not an "eventually". Even if the censorship downranks and removes results I disagree with and makes me feel warm and fuzzy and enjoy
by soundnote 3y ago
The actual grim part: It's not an "eventually". Even if the censorship downranks and removes results I disagree with and makes me feel warm and fuzzy and enjoy that my political enemies are gnashing their teeth, it can very well rob me of information it'd be useful to know.
eg. to this day many people live under the impression that Kyle Rittenhouse shot three black people. If asked to estimate how many unarmed blacks get killed by police, Democrat voters give absolutely wild estimates when according to shooting databases the actual number is about 20 a year. According to a poll D voters thought you had a 50% chance of dying if you caught Covid, which is completely nuts even with the earlier, more dangerous strains.
Yet these people think they're well informed and follow the Science™.
- lisasays 3y agoIf asked to estimate how many unarmed blacks get killed by police, Democrat voters give absolutely wild estimates when according to shooting databases the actual number is about 20 a year. Uh, no. By easily findable statistics, the number is more like 225+ a year - shot and killed. And is consistently disproportionate to the number of white victims.
- soundnote 3y agoWhat database are you using? The Washington Post records 12 unarmed black people shot in 2022, 11 in 2021, 18 in 2020, 12 in 2019, 22 in 2018. The 2023 tally thus far is at four. With no year filter, the total number of unarmed black victims is at 157 for the whole 2015-2023 period.