3 ms·
On the subject of tracking math, when I was subjected to it, I just didn't get it. The entire idea seemed to be giving students who were bored by the material
by faeriechangling 4y ago
On the subject of tracking math, when I was subjected to it, I just didn't get it.
The entire idea seemed to be giving students who were bored by the material more work than other students so they could be even more bored by the material but while never going at a faster pace because that would result in students learning material that wouldn't show up on that years standardised tests. Tracking was the norm, but at least my school was extremely reluctant to either let people skip a grade or hold back people a grade so they were preparing for standardised tests that provided them a reasonable challenge, as that would mean you were doing school with people who weren't your same age peers and that's bad!
I just never really understood why these tracked math programs were a good idea? They seemed EXTREMELY stupid to me at the time and I just don't understand how these classes were ever supposed to be a good idea. In the non-tracked classes you could at least blow through the work you were assigned more quickly.
- Bran_son 4y ago> I just never really understood why these tracked math programs were a good idea? Because by sabotaging "tracked" programs as you described, they can claim that "Middle- and high-performing students performed equally as well in both environments.", thus discrediting concerns that dumbing down math education to the lowest common denominator is harming high achievers.
- faeriechangling 4y agoMission accomplished I guess