3 ms·
> In some cases, sure, there is an identifiable source but most of the output is novel and the product of substantially all the input I think you skipped past
by dns_snek 4y ago
> In some cases, sure, there is an identifiable source but most of the output is novel and the product of substantially all the input
I think you skipped past the first paragraph:
> Makers of artificial-intelligence tools such as ChatGPT would be required to disclose copyright material used in building their systems, according to a new draft of European Union legislation
- nullc 4y agoSee Article 29.
- dns_snek 4y agoArticle 29, "Obligations of users of high-risk AI systems", where "high risk" systems are biometric identification, hiring, education, law enforcement, critical infrastructure, access to essential services, migration and the justice system? What does this have to do with "ChatGPT disclosing sources" as a generalized statement? Those are areas where complete transparency is absolutely required and you may use ChatGPT to meddle with them at your own peril.