3 ms·
Perhaps my analogy wasn't clear. I meant, the painting device uses your parameters, but also supplies some modifications. Like a stenograph. At the end of the
by pcthrowaway 4y ago
Perhaps my analogy wasn't clear. I meant, the painting device uses your parameters, but also supplies some modifications. Like a stenograph.
At the end of the day, generative AI, Stenograph, and this painting device are all tools.
If you shake a kaleidoscope and then take a picture through the lens, I'm pretty sure you have copyright on that photograph, even though someone else made the kaleidoscope
- AnthonyMouse 4y agoIt's not the presence of a machine which makes it ineligible for copyright. It's the absence of some independent creative expression. If you add significant creative expression to what the machine does, that's not the same thing as the output of a machine produced from a minimal input.
- pcthrowaway 4y agoWhat we're talking about here is definitely art where a human is providing independent creative expression, in combination with generative tools