Trading off security for user convenience is not objectively bad. In fact, it is always a must. The most secure product is no product. Of course, what you real

Trading off security for user convenience is not objectively bad. In fact, it is always a must. The most secure product is no product. Of course, what you really mean is that this tradeoff must be made in such a way that the product is still secure enough, as defined by the use-case. I only think this nitpick is warranted because we are discussing "epistemology".