4 ms·
As long as training data is generated by experts then experts cannot be supplanted, such is my theory.
by ipnon 3y ago
As long as training data is generated by experts then experts cannot be supplanted, such is my theory.
- spencerchubb 3y agoThey can be supplanted by experts who are more productive thanks to AI.
- CharlesW 3y agoSo turtles all the way down? AI built on data created by experts using AI built on data created by experts using AI built on data created by experts using…
- gumballindie 3y agoBut it's intelligent and can learn and create totally new things, remember?
- kajecounterhack 3y agoIsn't this the thing about productivity tools -- you can never make someone too productive. Once you've established a new baseline for productivity, they will want to be even more productive after that when new bottlenecks emerge.
- postalrat 3y agoSo a trip down can end with a person but not an AI? How are people not all the way down?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- susssin 3y agoFrom first principles wouldn't a model trained on the written law and court rulings be capable of supplanting an "expert" that is in essence creating derivative works based off of such documents?
- rmbyrro 3y agoIf you feed Newton's Laws to a LLM model, will it ever come up with the general relativity theory? I mean, maybe AGI will be capable in the future, but I don't see a LLM doing that. Experts are required, at least for now, to advance the body of knowledge.
- marcus_holmes 3y agoIIRC recently there's an AI trained in multiple disciplines that is making useful theories from cross-disciplinary correlations. Or maybe I dreamt it. Anyway, the thinking is that humans take so long to learn that we can't master two or more disciplines, and there's useful stuff in the gaps between disciplines that's actually quite easy to discover for even a simple AI model if it can be taught enough. It's not quite the same as extrapolating General Relativity, but it could be a case where AI advances the body of knowledge.