4 ms·
Agreed. Every time I see a story about the Voyagers, I wonder why a follow-up hasn't been done that is much faster and more capable.
by kristianp 4y ago
Agreed. Every time I see a story about the Voyagers, I wonder why a follow-up hasn't been done that is much faster and more capable.
- thatcherc 4y agoIt's the same reason the Voyagers launched in the late 70s - the Grand Tour configuration of the planets [0]. The outer planets align in a way that lets you chain together several gravity assists to achieve high enough speeds to escape the solar system. The trick is that configuration only occurs every 175 years. I don't think we have any space vehicles right now that could produce that same kind of delta-v with their own chemical/electrical/nuclear power. [0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Tour_program https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Tour_program
- skykooler 4y agoIt's feasible to do an alternate route to the outer solar system by using an ion engine, dropping the perihelion down below Venus's orbit and then using a Venus -> Earth gravity assist chain with the ion engine going the whole time. The downside is that this is a more lengthy process than the Grand Tour route, and you have to do all your maneuvers in the inner solar system because ion engines draw a lot of electrical power and solar panels get very weak once you get past Mars or so.
- CamperBob2 4y agoProbably because it made more sense to use the general information obtained from the Voyagers to design probes with specific capabilities to explore specific planets. The Cassini/Huygens mission might be a possible example.