> and I think the evidence strongly leans against you. What evidence, exactly? In the case of Kavanaugh there was literally none beyond mere accusations (inclu

> and I think the evidence strongly leans against you. What evidence, exactly? In the case of Kavanaugh there was literally none beyond mere accusations (including some that were entertained on mainstream news that ended up being exposed as fraudulent). > If you don't want to face the possible heat of a hearing, you don't accept the nomination. You are right that politics is always going to require a thick skin. But platforming baseless, sensationalized accusations of criminal conduct (the kind that would never turn into actual charges) is the kind of thing that is going to prevent anyone with any kind of reputation worth protecting from seeking office. This seems like a bad equilibrium state. > It has not been forgotten, and it will get paid back, with interest. I'm sure Democratic politicians will use any excuse they can to capture more power, just as most all politicians do. But you are in no position to make such threats, and I am in no position to respond to them. We are just two people with different beliefs arguing on the internet. Let's focus on the arguments.