3 ms·
What's so radical about it? I can understand some hesitance, but I've been working with IPv6 off and on for over 15 years so I'm probably too familiar with it
by icedchai 4y ago
What's so radical about it? I can understand some hesitance, but I've been working with IPv6 off and on for over 15 years so I'm probably too familiar with it now.
- JohnFen 4y agoBy "radical", I mean "completely different" -- as in, no backward compatibility at all.
- Dagger2 4y agoThere's *tons* of backwards compatibility in v6. It's got dual stack, Teredo, 6to4, 6rd, 6over4, ISATAP, 6in4/4in6, NAT64/DNS64, 464xlat, DS-lite, MAP-T/E, 4rd, LW4over6... it has pretty much every form of backwards compatibility that can possibly work with v4. v6 isn't radical in the slightest. It works very similarly to v4.