7 ms·
Problem is, if the machine could hold copyright without significant human authorship, a single entity could create virtually all the pictures conceivable then o
by wnkrshm 3y ago
Problem is, if the machine could hold copyright without significant human authorship, a single entity could create virtually all the pictures conceivable then own the copyright to all of visual art.
- Freebytes 3y agoAnd could theoretically cover the vector space of all 'reasonable' interpretations of 'art' within a small 32x32 image space. (That is, it would not need to cover all 32x32 pixels. Simply a subset of these that are within the realm of what humans might recognize as art.) Then own the copyright on all art that could ever be generated.
- gnopgnip 3y agoCopyright doesn't protect against independent creation. If it didn't, these generated works would also be infringing literally every work
- anigbrowl 3y agoThat seems like a problem with copyright rather than AI as such.