>I'd guess it would be a complaint about the age of the accusation. Anyone who knows anything about sexual assault would dismiss this as a serious threat to th

>I'd guess it would be a complaint about the age of the accusation. Anyone who knows anything about sexual assault would dismiss this as a serious threat to the credibility of the accusation. There was no reason for her to publicly make the accusation earlier. There is documentation of her privately making the accusation years before Kavanaugh's nomination. >Veteran watchers of the court know that those sort of accusations aren't a serious impediment to confirmation however. Who can forget Clarence Thomas's Coke cans? The hope was that society progressed in those nearly 30 years between the two nominations.