3 ms·
If he were to directly claim authorship, he would be lying. The copyright office issued specific guidelines saying that AI-generated content is not copyrightabl
by pie_flavor 4y ago
If he were to directly claim authorship, he would be lying. The copyright office issued specific guidelines saying that AI-generated content is not copyrightable. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/03/16/2023-05321/copyright-registration-guidance-works-containing-material-generated-by-artificial-intelligence#citation-12-p16191 https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/03/16/2023-05...
- gnopgnip 4y ago>The copyright office issued specific guidelines saying that AI-generated content is not copyrightable. The copyright office doesn't say that at all. "In the case of works containing AI-generated material, the Office will consider whether the AI contributions are the result of “mechanical reproduction” or instead of an author's “own original mental conception, to which [the author] gave visible form.” The answer will depend on the circumstances, particularly how the AI tool operates and how it was used to create the final work. This is necessarily a case-by-case inquiry."