3 ms·
I can agree that there should be as much insulation from the political process as possible but I believe lifetime appointments actually increase the politicizat
by thefaux 3y ago
I can agree that there should be as much insulation from the political process as possible but I believe lifetime appointments actually increase the politicization of the institution. There have been interesting proposals around, e.g. 18 year terms staggered in such a way that there is a new vacancy every two years or so. This has the advantage of limiting the damage a corrupt justice can do even in the event that a a corrupt appointment is made. The current system with lifetime appointments made _through_ an extremely political process with no accountability for sitting justices is awful and already looks like it may be the downfall of the institution. I am as disgusted by our politics is anyone but I am genuinely curious how we could possibly have reform and accountability for the institution without political action.
- joveian 3y agoThis is about how it works in Mexico (15 year terms). The 18 years might be needed to avoid a court majority from two four year presidential terms, although I'd say adopting the single six year presidential term would be a good change as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_Justice_of_the_Nation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_Justice_of_th...