4 ms·
Since the conversation seems to be focusing on the Apache 2.0 license, what would you do? Clearly there isn't a lot of precedent for "closed-source, free-to-use
by CrimsonCape 3y ago
Since the conversation seems to be focusing on the Apache 2.0 license, what would you do? Clearly there isn't a lot of precedent for "closed-source, free-to-use" licenses.
In this case Datomic maintains development control over their product and "source of truth" is still themselves, and the implicit assumption is that you enthusiastically use their product for free with no strings attached because you respect them as the source of truth.
- yencabulator 3y ago> Clearly there isn't a lot of precedent for "closed-source, free-to-use" licenses. Freeware has been a thing for mere four decades now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeware https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeware