4 ms·
I felt the exact same thing. I was pretty sure the answer was "No" but they were too chicken to write it. Were they hoping that people wouldn't notice?
by kevincox 4y ago
I felt the exact same thing. I was pretty sure the answer was "No" but they were too chicken to write it.
Were they hoping that people wouldn't notice?
- a2800276 4y agoYou'd think they could have just left that question out of their FAQ and licensed it with a "free-as-in-beer" click-through license.
- nerdponx 4y agoProbably. They were hoping that the less-informed (like me) would see "The Datomic binaries are being released under the Apache 2.0 license" and think "Datomic is relicensed under Apache 2.0".
- sneak 4y agoIt worked for Docker Desktop and BSC. The products even have github repos! There's just no source in them. It's open source cosplay.
- unionpivo 4y ago> It's open source cosplay. I am stilling that phrase. It's perfect.