Nothing wrong with that at all. But that's not what was said. Answering the question (that you posed to yourself in your own FAQ): "Is it Open Source?" by stati

Nothing wrong with that at all. But that's not what was said. Answering the question (that you posed to yourself in your own FAQ): "Is it Open Source?" by stating: "we've licensed the binary using an Open Source license" seems a bit disingenuous. A more matter-of-factly answer would have been: "No".