I agree, but it’s always a question of money. With the cost of transformation it’s possible the value of building will be zero or even negative. In this case th

I agree, but it’s always a question of money. With the cost of transformation it’s possible the value of building will be zero or even negative. In this case the owner of the building default and the building stay there and decay until the city take on the burden of demolition or transformation with dwindling tax revenue... Start to look like Detroit scenario. It doesn’t look that bad form the outside, I wonder what would it take to collapse like this.