3 ms·
Who said it was? Do it anyways. The cost of having an empty building in a big city is high. Getting some more people in there is good for the city, so the city
by dumbfounder 3y ago
Who said it was? Do it anyways. The cost of having an empty building in a big city is high. Getting some more people in there is good for the city, so the city should help. Having the downtown area decay is bad bad bad. But I am sure the owners are exploring every option they can. But to me the answer is simple: figure out a way to make it happen.
- drstewart 3y agoWell, nothing is stopping you from making an offer on the building.
- dumbfounder 3y agoI am more talking about the city than buyers.
- alfor 3y agoI agree, but it’s always a question of money. With the cost of transformation it’s possible the value of building will be zero or even negative. In this case the owner of the building default and the building stay there and decay until the city take on the burden of demolition or transformation with dwindling tax revenue... Start to look like Detroit scenario. It doesn’t look that bad form the outside, I wonder what would it take to collapse like this.