3 ms·
Is there nothing in between? While surveillance is indeed bad, also free pass is bad. So what should we do about the crimes already happening, as few as they mi
by soco 4y ago
Is there nothing in between? While surveillance is indeed bad, also free pass is bad. So what should we do about the crimes already happening, as few as they might be?
- 988747 4y ago[dead]
- bheadmaster 4y agoYes, there is a lot in between, that's the whole point of the hyperbole. Internet surveillance could solve child abuse, but so could nuclear bombs. Solutions to problems should be judged by the amount of collateral damage they cause. The original comment advocates for government surveillance of all digital communication - in my opinion, that causes a lot of collateral damage.
- vorpalhex 4y agoDid the last 5x times we did something help? How many "save the kids" bills have we passed that haven't worked? Repeal those and let's talk.