4 ms·
Agreed! While we're at it, we should also put cameras and microphones in every street corner, every public place, every household, every toilet. Everyone who r
by bheadmaster 4y ago
Agreed!
While we're at it, we should also put cameras and microphones in every street corner, every public place, every household, every toilet. Everyone who refuses to do so should be considered a terrorist for refusing to cooperate with the authorities who, we all know, are infallible, only have children's interest at heart, and would never abuse their power for their own gain.
We should not stop until every inch of the Earth is covered in surveillance technology - after all, nothing to hide, nothing to fear. That's the only way we can guarantee the safety of our children. And no price is too high for the safety of our children! Anyone who says otherwise is a terrorist and a child abuser, and if that's not obvious to you, you're a terrorist and a child abuser.
Privacy is a necessary precondition to child abuse - therefore, allowing privacy is allowing child abuse.
- throwaway71271 4y agowe are almost there: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMLsHI8aV0g https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMLsHI8aV0g nothing to hide, nothing to fear
- ChatGTP 4y agoNeed more AI and surveillance in our lives for sure.
- waselighis 4y agoWhile I knew China is a surveillance state with cameras and face rec everywhere, this is just horrid. Fuck, what a terrible place to live, I can't even imagine growing up there as a child.
- slaw 4y agoAgreed! The government should have access to all online accounts. Bank, email, Facebook,.. and at least once a day each citizen should give mandatory report what they were thinking.
- ihatepython 4y ago> and at least once a day each citizen should give mandatory report what they were thinking. So just like SCRUM?
- mypastself 4y agoUsing standups to determine who’s an upstanding citizen…
- psychlops 4y agoAbsolutely! And neo-Nazis are just a start, all illegal activities in all nations should be upheld as moral imperatives. The law should be treated as inviolable religious edicts and those who violate them as blasphemers and infidels!
- soco 4y agoIs there nothing in between? While surveillance is indeed bad, also free pass is bad. So what should we do about the crimes already happening, as few as they might be?
- 988747 4y ago[dead]
- bheadmaster 4y agoYes, there is a lot in between, that's the whole point of the hyperbole. Internet surveillance could solve child abuse, but so could nuclear bombs. Solutions to problems should be judged by the amount of collateral damage they cause. The original comment advocates for government surveillance of all digital communication - in my opinion, that causes a lot of collateral damage.
- vorpalhex 4y agoDid the last 5x times we did something help? How many "save the kids" bills have we passed that haven't worked? Repeal those and let's talk.
- MrMan 4y ago[dead]