4 ms·

> should be shared with blockchain No, this is not finally a use case for blockchains. (before any zealot goes "AHA!", obviously I mean a distributed trust bl

> should be shared with blockchain No, this is not finally a use case for blockchains. (before any zealot goes "AHA!", obviously I mean a distributed trust blockchain, not e.g. git)

EGreg 4y ago
git does not use a blockchain
- knorker 4y ago
  Not in a way that is relevant, I agree. But if you squint enough then it's an "immutable" ledger that appends and uses signatures. Blockchain zealots often yell out "git" as a success story of blockchain, whenever someone says "blockchain as a solution is yet to find an actual problem to be applied to". So that's just me trying to avoid a "gotcha!" from people who are talking nonsense. But it seems there's no way around it. Either I'll get a blockchain zealot replying "what about git!" or if I try to preempt that I get someone sane (like you) replying "git's not that!". Sigh.
  - EGreg 4y ago
    git uses a DAG, not a blockchain at all
    - knorker 4y ago
      I'm not disagreeing. Blockchain zealots like to play this game of semantics. You should direct your energy on debating semantics towards them instead.