This is some "argument by optical illusion" where they conclude that the phenomena of optical illusions are relevant to the phenomena of whether your boss blame

This is some "argument by optical illusion" where they conclude that the phenomena of optical illusions are relevant to the phenomena of whether your boss blames you that your project failed. It's almost literally trying to hypnotize the reader optically, to make the reader believe their conclusion. I saw this rhetoric device before and it seems more and more disingenuous to me each time I see it.