3 ms·
So this is really more of an image thing -- site responsiveness, accessibility, and so forth. Similar to how a shopkeeper might have paid 2500 each year to have
by DanielBMarkham 15y ago
So this is really more of an image thing -- site responsiveness, accessibility, and so forth. Similar to how a shopkeeper might have paid 2500 each year to have a sign custom-painted out front.
In that case, makes sense. I'm not an extreme cheapo -- I'm probably paying 1800 a year for my various hosting solutions, but that's spread across HostGator, a MT hosting company, and AWS. I'm moving to AWS -- exactly in the opposite direction that you are heading -- because I like buying cycles. I can set up databases, write code, and have more power to write hybrid sites. I'm beginning to look at producing content on the web, blogs, apps, static sites, or mixed-mode stuff, as more of an art form and less of a pre-canned WP experience. So I need a box, not a service.
But I look at this as simple content. I'm serving bits to folks who come and consume them. I don't generate consulting leads though my sites, I provide data people want for free, so as long as most of the people get most of the data, everything is copasetic on my end. It sounds like we have completely different purposes.
Just as a off-the-wall suggestion to other readers, you know you could write a script to consume your blog entries and move them to a CDN as static pages. You'd get a hell of a boost in performance, and I don't think you'd really have to change much. (Probably much tougher than I make it out to be. Haven't really thought it through. I use URL rewriting on some of my newer sites, so it all looks like static content anyway.)
- mattmanser 15y agoHow is that an 'image thing'? He's a professional programmer and SEO consultant. It's not an 'image thing'. It's a basic 'this is my job, why isn't it working' thing. That it's still such a pita in this day and age that you need professional keeper-uppers because it's so opaque and complicated that web programmers have no real clue what we're supposed to do is all a bit odd. Taking your analogy it's is more akin to the tills in the store keep crashing in the middle of the lunchtime rush. You can walk around and tell you customers it's the till software suppliers, but in the end it just reflects badly on you. Or you can follow your suggestion and get out a pad, a pen and a calculator and write out their bill. Neither is a good solution.
- gridspy 15y agoYou should only be creating custom solutions if this (blogging for instance) is your primary business. If you want to kick ass as a one-person team you have to know your limits and only spend time of things which are critical. Nice suggestion re CDN.
- sliverstorm 15y agoYou should only be creating custom solutions if this (blogging for instance) is your primary business Even more specifically, only if existing tools do not meet or cannot be adapted to your needs!
- gridspy 15y agoI disagree. If something is core to your business you cannot outsource it. Google couldn't use someone else's search engine Microsoft couldn't use an outside kernel or filesystem for windows Gridspy has to make its own dashboards. However, We can use handy libraries for html templating and graph rendering.
- sliverstorm 15y agoBut a blogger (the given example) produces content. A blogging platform is core to their business, but it isn't what brings value. In Google's case, the search engine is what brings value. Don't let yourself get caught up in NIH syndrome.