3 ms·
The message pretty clearly states that the visible presence of the homeless is a crime against the OP that leads to vigilantism (i.e., attacks on the homeless).
by legerdemain 3y ago
The message pretty clearly states that the visible presence of the homeless is a crime against the OP that leads to vigilantism (i.e., attacks on the homeless). This kind of eliminationist rhetoric is common on this site.
- Freedom2 3y agoCould you describe what other kinds of eliminationist rhetoric you encounter on this site?
- flangola7 3y agoAnything invoicing trans people like me, and especially anything involving families with trans kids. It's not by accident that everyone in my immediate social circle carries a weapon of some kind now. The existential threat from both the state and other citizens grows daily.
- thagebba 3y agoLooking forward to being the next Audrey Elizabeth Hale? Be careful you don't get radicalized even further than you already are.
- flangola7 3y agoCase in point. At least use your real account next time though.
- Freedom2 3y agoI'm genuinely sorry to hear that. Unfortunately, this forum looks to attract a certain kind of people, and those people find it easy to hide uncouth comments under the guise of "curious discussion". It doesn't help that moderation is almost non-existent, aside from when VC's get put under blast, or when . Asking for sources for ridiculous comments (eg: Dropbox laid off people in order of performance) gets flagged, then removed, but off-topic humor in bad taste remains.