2 ms·
> Thus, in scope for discussion. If it is, you're being too fuzzy about it in a way that makes claims that are simply not true. Specifically, some "synthesis
by tivert 4y ago
> Thus, in scope for discussion.
If it is, you're being too fuzzy about it in a way that makes claims that are simply not true. Specifically, some "synthesis of external influence" may be "unavoidable," but that does not mean immigration, especially legal immigration, is unavoidable. Embracing immigration is a policy choice the Japanese can decide not to make, even if Western liberals really disagree with the choice.
- tomrod 4y agoI'm confused why you are describing a Venn diagram where Japan is in one circle and the vaguely defined "Western liberals" are the complement. Yes, the current administrators of Japan can set a governance policy on who it attempts to allow to go through "approved" channels. Enforcing it, and especially attempting to enforce it to prevent, what I believe would be fair to summarize your prior comments, cultural contamination, won't work for the cause I've already mentioned: synthesis of external influence.