4 ms·
I'm not sure I understand the comparison. The Manhattan project was an exploration into a fundamental (and, without trying to sound ungenerous, a relatively si
by dmreedy 3y ago
I'm not sure I understand the comparison.
The Manhattan project was an exploration into a fundamental (and, without trying to sound ungenerous, a relatively simple) property of physics, put towards a relatively simple task. The laws of nature defined the constraints, and requirement was singular.
It was not an attempt to solve the constraint satisfaction problem of X stakeholders and Y requirements and Z logistical boundaries, where X, Y and Z are all in constant flux thanks to being attached to human beings who bullshit, lie, and change their minds frequently.
- MichaelZuo 3y ago> The Manhattan project was an exploration into a fundamental (and, without trying to sound ungenerous, a relatively simple) property of physics, put towards a relatively simple task. The laws of nature defined the constraints, and requirement was singular. Your points here don't square with what I know. Have you read the Wiki page on it and found something incorrect?
- CyberDildonics 3y agoCan you link exactly what you think contradicts what they are saying?