3 ms·
Can you explain your claims please? >Even the current number of humans alive - let alone people yet to be born - can't be maintained without continued growth,
by connectsnk 3y ago
Can you explain your claims please?
>Even the current number of humans alive - let alone people yet to be born - can't be maintained without continued growth, innovation, and the paradigm shifts resulting from that innovation and growth.
- BjoernKW 3y agoMore people require more food and more energy, both of which need to be produced, This can only happen through economic growth and efficiency gains.
- midoridensha 3y agoMore people could live with much less energy if they didn't all drive around in 3-ton fossil-fuel-burning metal boxes and live in huge, separate houses with HVAC.
- BjoernKW 3y agoThank you for most entitled comment in this thread so far. People in developing or newly industrialized countries typically don't drive SUVs or live in individual houses with HVAC. This idea that we could solve the climate change problem entirely by restricting the amount of energy people are allowed to consume in the Western world is a misguided and quaintly privileged point of view. For most of the rest of the world limiting growth would come down to population control and demanding people remain in abject poverty.