> The decline started at the end of the '50s, with the biggest drops happening in 1963-64 and plunging all of the way through the 60s. How exactly does this co

> The decline started at the end of the '50s, with the biggest drops happening in 1963-64 and plunging all of the way through the 60s. How exactly does this contradict what I wrote? The birth rate did start its decline in the 1950's, and the sexual revolution started later and progressed slower in Canada. Your link also supports my argument. There's also a lot more data that backs my argument. For one thing, birthrate declines are happening in places where the sexual revolution didn't happen. This sounds like mental gymnastics as a futile attempt to preserve an anti-immigration narrative. Going on a tangent, the only way to make ending Canada's immigration rate would work is if Canada can end its socialist programs like health care and social security. Even a lot of self identifying conservatives will balk at ending those entitlements. You can't have it both ways.