4 ms·

Then by definition it isn't open source, violating points 3, 4, and 6 of the open source definition. https://opensource.org/osd/ https://opensource.org/osd/

• yellowapple 4y ago
  Yep. It's getting really exhausting seeing projects falsely advertising themselves as "open source". Either be FOSS or don't be; don't pretend to be while using some nonsense like the BSL or whatever adhocery is in play here.
  • Mizza 4y ago
    In the README they even call it "Modified MIT", the modification being where they turned it from a very permissive license into a fully proprietary one. Very cool model though.
    • orra 4y ago
      Well, the Apache Software Foundation were rightly getting annoyed at 'modified Apache' licences...
  • aledalgrande 4y ago
    I bet it's a new benchmark for the labs to get funding