> I'm interested in hearing why you think that's the case, tho. It's a good question, and in hindsight I can see why it wouldn't be obvious. Basically: becaus

> I'm interested in hearing why you think that's the case, tho. It's a good question, and in hindsight I can see why it wouldn't be obvious. Basically: because the two are part of an equality gradient where one end is effectively an opportunity lottery with the worst odds and the other end is "sameness", and where a society draws the line (manifesting as parties with their positions, which of course means there can be more than one line to dice up the gradient a bit) depends on a whole host of factors. Culture, experiences, etc. Your points above largely support the Gradient argument; it's easy to assume teal is blue, or perhaps green, or to convince some people blue is green (comically, some stoplights come to mind). I'm merely sharing my formula for how the line manifests. I'm guessing we're on the same page and are debating a nuance. Lol