24 ms·
Sure. But again, that's not why copyright was invented. The application of your terms is based on the same "I own ideas" meme that Disney used to increase their
by boxed 4y ago
Sure. But again, that's not why copyright was invented. The application of your terms is based on the same "I own ideas" meme that Disney used to increase their ownership of movies and characters pretty much indefinitely for decades.
In my opinion you are both wrong. You agree with Disney on a premise that I reject.
Attribution should imo be covered by some other law. It's a different thing. It's lying about facts.
- zaphar 4y agoIn theory each of the things I care about could be covered by different laws or regulations. However they aren't. The only tool I have for that is copyright. If you find a route to getting those alternative methods established I'm all ears but as it stands such a route does not exist. Copyright is what you have so copyright is what you have to use.